Skip to main content
Library
  1. New search
  2. Josiah Forster (1693-1763)

Josiah Forster (1693-1763)

Person

Details

Type of entity: Person

Name: Josiah Forster

Date of birth: 1693

Date of death: 1763

Source of information: Special Collections

Possible others

We have other records in our catalogue of people and organisations that may match: Josiah Forster

Josiah Forster (1782-1870)

Josiah Forster (1693?-1763)

In our catalogue as creator or owner


Archive Print Item
Birkbeck Library 136.6: The people called Quakers defended, and the Baptists confuted, being a reply to Job Burt's pretended answer to R.B.'s 12th proposition, and to a book, intituled, A vindication of the doctrine of baptism, &c. To which is annex'd An appendix, in answer to Oswald Edwards of Dublin his attempt against the said book, &c. In which reply and appendix, their fallacious reasoning is detected

Archive Print Item
Birkbeck Library 491: A vindication of the doctrine of baptism, as held by the people call'd Quakers : in answer to Philip Bedingfield's pamphlets, especially that, called, A letter to a Quaker in Norfolk... With a questionary postscript directed to the clergy

Archive Print Item
Leeds Friends' Old Library 163: A vindication of the doctrine of baptism, as held by the people call'd Quakers : in answer to Philip Bedingfield's pamphlets, especially that, called, A letter to a Quaker in Norfolk... With a questionary postscript directed to the clergy

Archive Print Item
Leeds Friends' Old Library 2038: A vindication of the doctrine of baptism, as held by the people call'd Quakers : in answer to Philip Bedingfield's pamphlets, especially that, called, A letter to a Quaker in Norfolk... With a questionary postscript directed to the clergy

Archive Print Item
Society of Friends FOR: The people called Quakers defended, and the Baptists confuted, being a reply to Job Burt's pretended answer to R.B.'s 12th proposition, and to a book, intituled, A vindication of the doctrine of baptism, &c. To which is annex'd An appendix, in answer to Oswald Edwards of Dublin his attempt against the said book, &c. In which reply and appendix, their fallacious reasoning is detected